Thursday, February 23, 2017

progressive polesmokers and carpetmunchers complain about a phony faggot. news at 11.

Hey morons! 

Hey you!  You!  You, over there, complaining about Richard Spencer the Dallas pillow-biter/bottomy buttboy!

You're an idiot.

Spencer is a faggot who is fagging his way to twitter profile.  He's no more a political leader than Pee Wee Herman. 

He's an Ernst Rohm polesmoker who wants power, power to smite any breeder who won't have sex with him.  He's Tarzie, he's Chalupa, he's Michael J Smith/owen paine/Al Schumann.

He's a limpwristed pansy who floats along in his Ferragamos.

He's not a threat to anyone.

He's not a Montanan and doesn't represent Montana -- unless you count the rich fags who move to Montana to be a Big Daddy who shows all the little farm/ranch twinks how to go Brokeback.

You have been trolled by a faggot who pretends he's not a poochie.

Dude is 100% gay and 100% closeted.

And Whitefish MT?

More rich Texans and Californians there than multi-gen Montanans.


--Paul Behrer, who knows more about Montana, Whitefish, and e-toughguys than anyone, but who doesn't know why faggots always pretend they're not poochies when they want shekels and fame.

5 comments:

Chet Redweld said...

Pablo, can you explain the term "poochie"?

Paul Behrer said...

Sure.

College era slang, sequencing like this:

faggot --> French Poodle

French Poodle --> fancy poochie, not Real Dog

ergo

faggot --> poochie

Chet Redweld said...

When this blog originated the idea, aimed at Chalupa:

"be the dog, don't be the flea"

it was making a similar sequential snipe?

As in, "be a Real Dog, don't be a poochie"?

Paul Behrer said...

Exactly, Chet.

Nothing gets past you.

Karl Franz Ochstradt said...

Hey, Pablo: you see this? --

http://www.thestranger.com/features/2017/01/11/24794084/searching-for-richard-spencer-what-i-found-in-a-small-montana-town-at-the-center-of-a-neo-nazi-troll-storm

The top photo is doctored, with the Our Lady of the Rockies (which stands atop the Continental Divide above Butte, MT and not on the ski hill above Whitefish MT) suggested as something sinisterly forcing anti-Semitism in Whitefish.

The rest of the article lies extensively through its teeth. Whitefish is, not by size of population but by depth and type of resident attitudes, the most Un-Montana town in Montana. Second place would be Bozeman, third would be Missoula, fourth would be Bigfork.

The author apparently found some angry progressive Jew transplants in Whitefish to deliver a garishly distorted view of the town and region, and then took these fictions to be the truth.

And on the subject of anti-Semitism in Montana, could I please raise the issue of Jewish people throughout Montana who moved there and immediately commenced complaint regarding the horrible Christian influence?

I've been listening to these complaints from the handful of Jews I know in Missoula for over a decade. During that same time, I've never felt, heard, seen or been affected by any Christian influences. Not once.

Yet during the same time, I've watched a lot of image-based spending scams by Missoula city and county governments, for Jewish "development" projects in which a Jewish entrepreneur uses public funds for private gain.

That's probably why Jon Krakauer did a hit piece on Missoula and Eli Sanders just did one on Whitefish.

The funny thing is, both towns have more Jewish influence in the 21st Century than Christian influence.

But in any case, Richard B. Spencer, gay provocateur, is just doing a Gay Ward Cleaver version of Milo Breitbartopoplous, and his activities have nothing to do with mean-ness toward Jews nor overwhelming Christian influence.

There's no First Amendment wrongful intertwining in Whitefish on behalf of Christianity.

But there is such intertwining on Judaism's behalf.

So they're lying -- both Eli Sanders and Jon Krakauer -- about Montana.