Sunday, February 26, 2017

this is the deal

How many times do you have to be told, this is how it's been your entire life ?


If you only recently "discovered" or "learned" or "realized" that Hillary Clinton is worse than Dubya Bush despite overt D vs R shenanigans, why do you stop there, and assume that the Ds are bad just because they put Hillary Clinton up in November 2016?

Why do you assume the Ds were at any point your friend?

They weren't.  Not ever.

Is it because acknowledgment of this simple fact makes you realize, hey, I've been duped the entire time I thought I'd made the superior choice ?


When your vaunted public schools taught you that FDR's New Deal was Progress Embodied and also the lodestone for all forms of Progress henceforth from the New Deal's inception, did you actually think this was the truth, and not just what the Ds wanted you to think so they'd have their toehold for power climbing?


Why do you still harbor the delusion --the D-fabricated illusion-- that only the Rs play dirty and lie?

When you objectively research partisan politics in the history of the US Govt's workings, you should start to see that wars were begun eagerly by the Party of Progress.  Your D heroes.

You should start to see that the "environmental" acts of the US Govt mostly were instigated by Rs.  And that the weakening of such Federal positions and actions, thereafter, was mostly undertaken by Ds.


Did you need a fake scrivener who used to call himself "Jack Crow" to convince you that I'm saying what's true?

Why is that?

Is it because you never really knew anything and, instead, just parroted what you assumed all good noble humanist-/progressive-thinking people should believe/know/advocate?

Is it because symbols and sales pitches gulled you, even though you posture as a supremely intellectual skeptic with refined sensibilities?


Do you really think people, human beings in America I mean, for the most part really do prefer "kindness" in social engagement, and in accretions and assertions of power?

I don't think you pay much attention to anything, and I don't think you know yourself very well either.

Perhaps this is because you live inside a fabricated reality.

Maybe you should ask why this surrealism was first created, inside your mind, as part of your outlook.

Investigate why your "learned elders" groomed you as they did.

And really:  stop blaming everyone but yourself.

It's what worked for me.

--H.M. Lohmann

Thursday, February 23, 2017

progressive polesmokers and carpetmunchers complain about a phony faggot. news at 11.

Hey morons! 

Hey you!  You!  You, over there, complaining about Richard Spencer the Dallas pillow-biter/bottomy buttboy!

You're an idiot.

Spencer is a faggot who is fagging his way to twitter profile.  He's no more a political leader than Pee Wee Herman. 

He's an Ernst Rohm polesmoker who wants power, power to smite any breeder who won't have sex with him.  He's Tarzie, he's Chalupa, he's Michael J Smith/owen paine/Al Schumann.

He's a limpwristed pansy who floats along in his Ferragamos.

He's not a threat to anyone.

He's not a Montanan and doesn't represent Montana -- unless you count the rich fags who move to Montana to be a Big Daddy who shows all the little farm/ranch twinks how to go Brokeback.

You have been trolled by a faggot who pretends he's not a poochie.

Dude is 100% gay and 100% closeted.

And Whitefish MT?

More rich Texans and Californians there than multi-gen Montanans.

--Paul Behrer, who knows more about Montana, Whitefish, and e-toughguys than anyone, but who doesn't know why faggots always pretend they're not poochies when they want shekels and fame.

his story, it's basically the history of MTB suspension from one POV

Bryson Martin gets huge respect for his candid interview, now found at VitalMTB in a podcast.

You don't find many people who can synthesize so many social & economic factors so adeptly, not in any line of business or entertainment/diversion. 

Bryson Martin's synthesis -- as focused on the development of MTB suspension and the current clusterfuck of standards being introduced willy-nilly, and the resultant MTB rider/consumer confusion and frustration -- that's something you won't find anywhere in MTB journalism.

I assume that's because most MTB publications are run by desperate little dweebs who are beholden to GROWING THE SPORT,** and because such GROWING is defined practically as, "defend every new thing introduced in the industry regardless of its practicality and/or wastefulness."

The world needs people who aren't so afraid of losing access that they lie directly to their audience.

Thanks, Bryson.

--C.F. Oxtrot, ancient athlete


** No, hack journos sustaining their access to ProDeal/wholesale gear pricing isn't related in any way to the sport of MTB.  People will ride MTBs because they like to ride MTBs, regardless of whether some schmuck at pinkbike or even VitalMTB continues to get "access" to HOT GEAR.  The Sport is merely the activity.  The BUSINESS is different from the Sport.  Get that straight & clear in your lying noggins, you 35 year old teenagers.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

attic rattles

A little over 4 years ago, our scrivener Paul Behrer suggested this song/video in response to someone's failed attempt at joining in the UNSF celebratory satire:

When Mr Kidwell's singing begins, he talks about York & Greenmount: two big streets in northern Baltimore.

So if you don't know Baldy-More, you won't get what Ryan's saying -- or will you?


Incidentally, I'm crawling back 4+ years in my background-rummaging for the material that will comprise charlatan Jordan Peterson's downfall.  It's going to crack some heads!


Thursday, February 16, 2017

move aside, Chet. this is more important.

Back in the run-up to the 2016 POTUS election, we had a little jibber-jabber in the comments regarding a hypothesis that our current President, who then was merely the GOP nominee, was an agent of Seis Puntas.

Specifically, I observed the following, in response to a question posed by Hy Lohmann, which is shown below in italics.  The "she" referenced by Hy was/is the YouTube video commentator "Goyim Goddess" a/k/a Sinead McCarthy.

The video I watched today said that she predicts Trump will be elected and after taking the White House will be revealed as a stooge of Seis Puntas. You guys have any thoughts on that?

It would be a very roundabout way to achieve that end. Trump's the least likely of all the POTUS candidate, D or R, to be owned by Volkihar Clan. His independent wealth, even if largely inherited from his father, means he can run a campaign without AIPAC loot dominating the message and agenda. Some say Adelson gave $$ to Trump but Adelson plays every angle with $$ and probably has given $$ to every POTUS candidate in the past 5 POTUS elections. Someone of that wealth level can give directly or not, so you never really know where $$ originates even if the donor lists can be found & published.

On the D side every candidate is owned by AIPAC, including nominal non-D Jill Stein.

But whether McCarthy's prediction rings true? I'm guessing you watched for other reasons. What candidate would McCarthy not say is owned by Seis Puntas? Isn't that sorta her angle? Pretty or not? It's a fair reflection/inverse image of AIPAC and Seis Puntas insisting that every candidate must be a Friend of Israel.

Honeytrap? Not if you just want to be entertained and aren't treating it as verified factual reality.

That's my take on it, Hy.
During the months passed between election day 2016 and the present, Trump's choices of advisors, cabinet heads, etc. have suggested that Ms McCarthy was correct.

The question Hy posed to me recently was this:

"So she was correct, but were you wrong, Karl?  You only talked about McCarthy's angle, and didn't say whether you thought it possible that the GOP nominee was actually working for the neoCons."

In fairness to Hy and to Ms McCarthy, I have to say that I don't often make pointed, blunt political predictions as a matter of serious discourse.

Sometimes I may offer a position that seems completely earnest, when in truth I type it and post it just because, in Pixberg-ese, it needs said.

Needs said -- to make a point, to shine a wee light into a dark corner, blah blah blah... whatever metaphor/simile you prefer should work here I'm sure.

Seriously:  the nearest thing to religion I have is the occasional inspiration of nihil es est floating into my field of view/thought.

Since that's true, how could I ever be so naive as to think any POTUS candidate would not be cattle for Team Volkihar?

I'm not 11 years old.

So, in answer to Hy's recent question:  no, I wasn't wrong.  I didn't believe His Whimsical Tweeting POTUSness, if he actually became POTUS, would be free of the vampire clan's influences.

It was and still is a bit difficult to overlook the fact that vampires are within the First Family already.

*   *   *

This might be a good time for a reminder of what Chet was saying:  this blog always has been about values.

--K.F. Ochstradt, who is sure the nation's path continues to be the ever-shrinking, coiling-while-descending path of a bit of flotsam in a whirlpool.  The Oroville Dam ought to suggest at least that much.

Yeah, history is bullshit, look to the future, "technology" will save us from this neglect.

zoiks! egads! heavens to murgatroyd!

One thing upon which we of the invisible sector can rely is that our observations will get stolen, pilfered, lifted, jacked, etc. for the purpose of repackaging as another's original(s).

Equally reliable is finding this occurrence simultaneously in attendance: credit was/is not, and will/shall not, be given.










The plagiarism might be defended as this bastardization of the semiotic trio mentioned above:




But it wouldn't wash.

Autist knows wrong/right.

Spergie does too.


If you are a professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto, is plagiarism an issue of honor breach?

Are standards more lax above the USA/CDN border?

When I was thawed out and shown this Gossipy Birds post by one Paul Behrer, late of this blog's authorial roster, he said by way of explanation toward his disturbing my frozen slumber --

"Jordie gots some 'splainin to do."

Pablo said this blog has, at some point within the past two to two-and-a-half years, already offered the ideas and causal/explanatory sequence "originated" by Jordan Peterson in that tweet.

It's my job to go find it.

And that's what I'm gonna do.

--Chet Redweld, out of cryogenic storage for emergent response.

PS to "Professor" Jordan Peterson:  I'm not sure what you think is honorable about taking credit for this blog's work, but if Mr. Behrer is correct, I am sure you are going to learn exactly how much dishonor can be brought down upon you from across your nation's southern border.    //CBR