Wednesday, July 27, 2016

you's a dumbfuck blinded by kook-ology

This morning I saw the "Edward Snowden = Hero" notion trumpeted in two different settings.

One was Dmitry Orlov.  For a supposedly intelligent Russian engineer, Orlov is mighty eager to accept a Hollywood B-grade Movie story regarding amaporn twink Fast Eddie Snowjob.

Here's Orlov making the Fast Eddie Snowjob story more dependable/reliable/concrete:

The whole Edward Snowden imbroglio was particularly fun to watch.

There was NO imbroglio actually happening. What happened was theatre. B-movie stuff. If the US Govt felt "Snowden" had damaging documents, "Snowden" would be a rotting corpse now. Instead he was un-catchable, by a Govt that supposedly successfully found Osama bin Laden and killed him.

********************

Another Snowjob was the maybe-satirical twitter account of Ricky Vaughn, quoting some onanist named Jack Goldsmith.

Mr Goldsmith, whose allegiance and fealty to Seis Puntas is beyond question, appears to be a "law professor at Harvard."  Yeah, big deal.  Mark Tushnet is another "Harvard law professor" whose insanity hasn't prevented him from being a "respected" member of the "law professor" caste across America's supposedly best law schools.

Since "cybersecurity" is not really an area of law, but instead an area of business and IT architecture, it's really simple to proclaim yourself as the "expert" in "cybersecurity law."  Because there's no such thing really.  It's a market, not a field of law.  Goldsmith is no more an expert in this area than Glenn Greenwald is an expert in Constitutional law -- he's not an expert at all.  He's just selling himself as one.

Here's Jack Goldsmith, a/k/a Giacomo Geltsmitter, lionizing the mythology of Fast Eddie Snowjob:

4/ The Snowden docs reveal that the U.S. penetrates an unfathomable number of networks worldwide.

No they do not. They reveal nothing. The "Snowden docs" are nothing. They are like the discarded sheets of numerous TicTacToe wars my friends and I had during 1st grade recess on a rain day in elementary school.

Notice how the statement is so vague as to be irrefutable.  What is an "unfathomable number" and how would one vet this claim?  Ask the boys at Ft Meade?  Sure, they always open the doors to random Crimson snowjobs.

Giacomo utters this lie after ID'ing himself as a Crimson Big-Brain in order to sanctify and make granitic the Fast Eddie Snowjob myth. NONE of the documents which ALLEGEDLY came from Fast Eddie Snowjob show ANYTHING of any moment whatever.

NOBODY ever shows these documents when talking about what they "say."

They are Tooth Fairy, coin-under-pillow bullshit.

If you take this stuff seriously, you show what an idiot you are.  You may as well be the dilated anal sphincter who calls himself Tarzie, imagining that everything going on in the world now is about Enn Ess Eh versus See Eye Eh wrangling.  Anyone selling that line of coprolitic distraction is a spookahdookah.  Or a spookahdookah-wannabe.  Most likely on the payroll of Mossy Advertisement, or Shiny Betty.


-- Karl Franz Ochstradt, who is certain that "Jack Goldsmith" is an agent of provocation at least partially paid by Seis Puntas to distract and keep misinformed the American public for the sake of the Volkihar Clan agenda.  Dual loyalty people like Geltsmitter should be forced to repatriate in Israel or be put to death for treason if remaining in the Ooh Ess Eh and continuing to serve Seis Puntas.

5 comments:

Charles F. Oxtrot said...

Hah hah hah, that's a good one Karlos. Much as I admire Putin's steadfast attitude, and despite Orlov often showing brilliance in analysis and comedy, this is one of those places where Orlov looks like kaygeebee, though I'm not sure why those people would need you to believe the Fast Eddie Snowjob. I'd be completely comfortable with the truth being that kaygeebee either on its own or through a separate non-paid hacker is who cracked various nodes within the contiguous forty-eight.

But in any case, the few supposed (meaning: presented as if) Snowjob Docs I've looked at are completely pointless. They are like the classic junk email any business IT staffer would see if snooping on employee internal or external email. Madge got new nail polish. Stanley's wearing highwater pants again today. Bengals gonna win tonight. Pete Rose shouldn't be HoF because he gambled. Et cetera.

As to Goldsmith, for sure he's a con artist and very likely working for Trash Bin Net & Yahoo. Well done categorizing him with Tushnet, whose insanity has been clear for years, and just relatively latent before May 2016. The best thing is how Crimson Big-Brain mythology crumbles with each such craploaf uttered by people like Tushnet or Goldsmith.

Say, did anyone ever tell you that my pops was in cryptography? Don't believe them if they do.

H.M. Lohmann said...

I have no opinion on what Karlos or Chuck say above. I just wanted to say that earlier this morning, I discovered the thermogenically videogenic Sinead McCarthy, who makes videos for HughTewb under the handle Goyim Goddess. Damn she looks like a younger, but much more attractive, Samantha Power. I really like her introverted way of not looking at the lens when she talks to the camera.

The video I watched today said that she predicts Trump will be elected and after taking the White House will be revealed as a stooge of Seis Puntas. You guys have any thoughts on that?

Frank Lee, Professional Amateur Gamer said...

They are like the classic junk email any business IT staffer would see if snooping on employee internal or external email. Madge got new nail polish. Stanley's wearing highwater pants again today. Bengals gonna win tonight. Pete Rose shouldn't be HoF because he gambled. Et cetera.

Just like any hacked terminal in F3 or FNV. You hack it thinking you'll find info that will be useful later in the game, but what you get is a bunch of intra-office gossip. Snow job.

Karl Franz Ochstradt said...

The video I watched today said that she predicts Trump will be elected and after taking the White House will be revealed as a stooge of Seis Puntas. You guys have any thoughts on that?

It would be a very roundabout way to achieve that end. Trump's the least likely of all the POTUS candidate, D or R, to be owned by Volkihar Clan. His independent wealth, even if largely inherited from his father, means he can run a campaign without AIPAC loot dominating the message and agenda. Some say Adelson gave $$ to Trump but Adelson plays every angle with $$ and probably has given $$ to every POTUS candidate in the past 5 POTUS elections. Someone of that wealth level can give directly or not, so you never really know where $$ originates even if the donor lists can be found & published.

On the D side every candidate is owned by AIPAC, including nominal non-D Jill Stein.

But whether McCarthy's prediction rings true? I'm guessing you watched for other reasons. What candidate would McCarthy not say is owned by Seis Puntas? Isn't that sorta her angle? Pretty or not? It's a fair reflection/inverse image of AIPAC and Seis Puntas insisting that every candidate must be a Friend of Israel.

Honeytrap? Not if you just want to be entertained and aren't treating it as verified factual reality.

That's my take on it, Hy.

Chet Redweld said...

Just in case a tumbleweed is lazy:

http://pezcandy.blogspot.com/search?q=snowden