Wednesday, March 16, 2016
wahn baiwee, Silent T "science editor," has no reply
I have no idea who that guy pictured is, nor whether that was his commentary put adjacent to the picture, but this isn't about "expertise" nor comparing CVs for merit-based honoring/rejection of a posted thesis.
Is that statement in any way true? Does it resonate in any way with you?
If wahn baiwee wants to demonstrate he knows anything at all on the subjects where he pontificates, I'd like to see him respond to the image/thesis above, as well as to this.
But it's delusional to think wahn baiwee has enough integrity to do so. He's much more likely to see the linked book was published by the Sierra Club, and assume that Wendell Berry is merely a liberal polemicist. That's the sort of depth of understanding and wisdom I've come to expect from wahn baiwee, who is quite the con artist.
-- Karl Franz Ochstradt, who knew more in 7th grade about science than wahn baiwee knows presently at 60-something rings on his anti-Druidic trunk.