Wednesday, February 17, 2016

sorry, but you didn't, and you shouldn't say you did

Eeny Huelsh:

I used to teach negotiation to MBA students and lawyers seeking CLE credit.

What a brazen liar.  Eeny's never taught anyone but his blogaudience of Marxist-lite schmendricks.  And I don't really categorize under "teaching" the act of misreading other people's motives, or the act of cherry-picking the details marshaled to martial purpose.

Good thing the Ding-Dong believes him and regularly cites him.  Gosh, that Chalupa is kayfabe embodied, isn't he?

Meta, Loretta!  You too, Henrietta!

I don't know up from down, but I do know when someone says the right kind of Marxist-lite BS, the kind that makes me feel superior for being a lifelong Red.

I guess if Glenn Greenwald can claim specialty in Constitutional Law, Ian Welsh can claim he teaches negotiation in a formal setting for pay.  The question I'd have for Professor Welsh is this:  where did you teach such things, under whose aegis, and what was the content?

I don't imagine many Marxist-lite ADR theories work out there in America where the driving economic system isn't Marxist and the disputes arising thereunder assume a landscape that is a polar opposite of Marxism.  Trying to settle a dispute with Marxism is sure to continue the dispute rather than resolve it.  But I'm sure Professor Welsh could rectify my mistaken appraisals, since he's a blogger and I'm only a lawyer and I've only resolved hundreds of disputes myself.

19 comments:

Harold Caidagh said...

...since he's a blogger...

...whose expertise (such as it is) cannot be verified by anyone other than his Marxist-lite sycophant blogreaders, and they just assume it since he tells them what they want to hear and/or want to be true.

Karl Franz Ochstradt said...

Walter Mitty

Honoria Helper, L.C.S.W. said...

There's no way a homophobic bigot reactionary cis-het-patriarchist misogynist rape-apologist like you could ever resolve any disputes. You don't understand anything but white men who rape everything they see, since that's what you are.

Chet Redweld said...

Yes. Certainly. One's ability to resolve disputes depends strictly on whether one is a Marxist. If not, no mediating skill exists. No settlement master abilities reside. The only people who understand dispute resolution and/or negotiation are Marxists.

In fact that's probably the only litmus paper analog you need, eh?

"Is your mediator a Marxist? Yes or No. If No, then your mediator can't really understand negotiation and clearly wouldn't comprehend the praxis."

I've known some terrible teachers in my lifetime, but a Marxist "teacher of negotiation strategy" has to be pretty near the top in the ranking of worst to best teacher.

ifthePopovichdontgetyaV3.0 said...

You idiot, it was guest author parachutec who wrote that, and he's the genuine article.

Harold Caidagh said...

Oh. Excuse me. That's sort of like Tarzie saying he's a different person from BLCKDGRD or amish rake fight or Cats not War. Or like John MICHAEL Greer saying he's not the author of the 300+ comments at his blog. Or like Chris Floyd saying he's not Grandma Sheila and Phylter and Duwayne Josephsson. Yes, when Ian Welsh pretends to be "parachutec", we're all gulled!

Next in line: Ian Welsh argues that he's not the same Jack Crow from The Crow's Eye.

ifthePopovichdontgetyaV3.0 said...

You idiot, we all thought you were our blogbuddy back in the 2010-2011 era, but you've shown yourself to be nothing more than a disgusting breeder reactionary misogynist homophobe cis-het-patriarchy-promoter. We thought you were a Marxist like us. You seemed Leftist, even if not Marxist. You seemed like you were BDR's buddy, Crow's buddy, everyone's buddy. Then you turned on us. Go die in a fire.

Paul Behrer said...

This blog hasn't ever "turned" in any direction, nor against any person. If you mistakenly believed that liking the same musicians/songs, or knowing the same (non-political) cultural reference points as joke fodder meant that anyone at this blog was a Marxist because you say you're a Marxist, that responsibility and that guilt sits on your shoulders. If you have a hard time understanding this blog's numerous obvious references to a global mockery position with no fixed political alignment, that's on you and your failure at reading comprehension.

Ironic, for a gang who pride themselves as intellectuals and polymaths-in-literature-reading -- don't you think?

Karl Franz Ochstradt said...

It is funny, the way these people think UNSF "turned". For example, in the case of BDR and Crow, each of them began accusing this blog's writers of homophobia, reactionary thinking, misogyny, rape apology, rape fantasy, Republican/Corporate affiliation. It wasn't until such accusations were parroted over and over and over that anyone at this blog began mocking the routine that Crow and BDR got angry and then each of them ramped up his anger with vitriolic posts about "misogynists" and "corporate" and "rape culture" and the like. Each of BDR and Crow were relatively apolitical on gender/sex/image nonsense, but something posted at UNSF appears to have turned them into Social Justice War Spew Vectors. Crow even retired before turning to the "Ian Welsh" character blog, which supposedly is more "honest" about the voices invigorating The Crow's Eye. In contrast, BDR has just vomited crap about how an "Obamapostasy" really is the pivotal thing, and if you've had one, then you're seeing clearly every possible development on the landscape.

Even if you still love the Ds and support Bernie -- your Obamapostasy, and/or hatred of Hillary, proves your progressive bona fides.

As you can see, it was these various puppets who mistakenly assumed this blog was written by a Progressive. Their mistake must become a projection. That's because, as Progressives, they know only passive-aggressive.

H.M. Lohmann said...

So, "progressive" equals "Marxist"?

Chet Redweld said...

Not really, but "-ists" always equal "fettered solipsistic viewpoint, advanced tribally."

In the realm of objectivity (vs subjectivity), the "-ist" is a failure.

Charles F. Oxtrot said...

It all traces back to Billmon/Moon of Alabama/Whiskey Bar and the pretend-wonks who echo-chambered their thinkalike conclusions about the world and what should be done within that world. They may seem to be separate individual entities, these complainers like BDR and Welsh/Crow and Greer and Floyd and Silber and Tarzie, but they're really just the Laverne and Shirley to Billmon's Happy Days.

You might even say that this blog's ripping into Greenwald is what got them riled up.

H.M. Lohmann said...

Hmmm.

Ironic coincidence that during the past 9 mos or so, Tom Feeley's little begging blog has begun to run regular essays by Moon of Alabama, reinforcing the pretend-wonkery residing at the Billmon Palace? Or inevitable development given how this blog mocks Feeley as a human, and as an authentic creator of a blog where many different ACTUAL people participate?

Chet Redweld said...

Not sure, but have you noticed how the PC Roberts essays at ICH have begun agreeing with many of this blog's various observations, whereas 5 years back, PCR was still making arguments about jobs, housing starts, and "economic indicators" while presently he explains those points as subterfuge and/or lyingly presented?

H.M. Lohmann said...

So who is "Tom Feeley"?

Chet Redweld said...

Not really important exactly whom is the keyboard-massager/-rapist claiming the identity.

More important that it's all disinfo/psyops stuff. Who'd want to lie to their audience, but goat-ropers and rodeo clowns?

Notice how lately, essays at ICH always bemoan the present state of affairs while also saying we need to support Bernie in order to change things? Is that kind of inherent inconsistency evidence of lying, or of stupidity?

Harold Caidagh said...

It's always the Republicans' fault at ICH. Even when Democrats do something, it was Republicans who caused the act.

Is the spoon responsible for the fat person?

ifthePopovichdontgetyaV3.0 said...

The Democrats wouldn't do those things without the insane reactionary Repthuglicans doing what they do. The Democrats are forced to be idiots, hypocrites, and greedy selfish liars who pretend to care about everyone. Their pretenses are obligatory, given the Corporate nature of the Repthuglicans.

If the Repthuglicans would simply renounce their GOP status and agree to be Progressive Democrats, the Democrats would begin showing some integrity and honesty. So things really are the Repthuglicans' fault. Only an idiot can't see that.

ifthePopovichdontgetyaV3.0 said...

Reference librarians. We're here to protect the Secret Knowledge. Nobody can thoroughly research anything without our intervening gatekeeping protecting the real truth held within the Secret Knowledge.

For example: Obamapostasy. This state of being reveals true Ultimate Sage status. If you now renounce support for Obama in 08 or 12, you prove you have clarity of political vision. If you take that vision and turn it into advocacy for Bernie Sanders, you have shown that you know the Secret Knowledge.

Also: religion is horrible, reactionary and really, the domain of Christers. I renounce all religion myself, because Zionism is Marxism is Truth. We must destroy Christians and Muslims in order to have Truth prevail.