Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Barry O in a thoughtful moment.

United States President Barack Obama (center, above) takes a moment to consider his foreign policy concerns regarding Greece. Greek Minister of Security Stavros Souvlaki (right, above) is scanning the area for security risks. The identity of the woman on the left, above remains undisclosed due to national security concerns by the United States and Greece, jointly and severally, share and share alike in perpetuity. So help me John Barth.

thanks to my friend John Henderson for the photo.

PRN hires new Director of Research

Read all about it at PRN, here.

Congratulations, Surrey!

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

if true: unsurprising, yet infuriating anyway

Leaked ACTA Draft Treaty Reveals Plans for Net Clampdown

Paul Meller, IDG News Service
The U.S., Europe and other countries are secretly drawing up rules designed to crack down on copyright abuse on the Internet, in part by making ISPs liable for illegal content, according to a copy of part of the confidential draft agreement that was seen by the IDG News Service.

It is the latest in a series of leaks from the anticounterfeiting trade agreement (ACTA) talks that have been going on for the past two years. Other leaks over the past three months have consisted of confidential internal memos about the negotiations between European lawmakers.

The chapter on the Internet from the draft treaty was shown to the IDG News Service by a source close to people directly involved in the talks, who asked to remain anonymous. Although it was drawn up last October, it is the most recent negotiating text available, according to the source.

It proposes making ISPs (Internet service providers) liable under civil law for the content their subscribers upload or download using their networks.

To avoid being sued by a record company or Hollywood studio for illegally distributing copyright-protected content, the ISP would have to prove that it took action to prevent the copyright abuse, according to the text, and in a footnote gives an example of the sort of policy ISPs would need to adopt to avoid being sued by content owners:

"An example of such a policy is providing for the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscriptions and accounts in the service provider's system or network of repeat offenders," the text states.

Terminating someone's subscription is the graduated response enacted in France last year that sparked widespread controversy. The French law is dubbed the "Three Strikes" law because French ISPs must give repeat file sharers two warnings before cutting off their connection.

Other countries in Europe are considering similar legal measures to crack down on illegal file-sharing. However, E.U.-wide laws waive ISPs' liability for the content of messages and files distributed over their networks.

European Commission officials involved in negotiating ACTA on behalf of the E.U. insist that the text being discussed doesn't contradict existing E.U. laws.

"There is flexibility in the European system. Some countries apply judicial solutions (to the problem of illegal file-sharing), others find technical solutions," said an official on condition he wasn't named.

He said the E.U. doesn't want to make a "three strikes" rule obligatory through the ACTA treaty. "Graduated response is one of many methods of dealing with the problem of illegal file-sharing," he said.

He also admitted that some in the Commission are uncomfortable about the lack of transparency in the ACTA negotiations.

"The fact that the text is not public creates suspicion. We are discussing internally whether the negotiating documents should be released," he said, but added that even if it was agreed in Brussels that the documents should be made public, such a move would require the approval of the E.U.'s 10 ACTA negotiating partners.

The participating countries are the U.S., the E.U., Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Singapore, Jordan, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates.

In a separate leak that first appeared on blogs last week, the European Commission updated members of the European Parliament on the most recent face-to-face meeting between the signatory countries, which took place in Mexico at the end of last month.

According to that leak, the Internet chapter of the treaty was discussed, but no changes to the position suggested by the U.S. last fall were agreed.

"The internet chapter was discussed for the first time on the basis of comments provided by most parties to US proposal. The second half of the text (technological protection measures) was not discussed due to lack of time," the memo said, adding:

"Discussions still focus on clarification of different technical concepts, therefore, there was not much progress in terms of common text. The U.S. and the E.U. agreed to make presentations of their own systems at the next round, to clarify issues."

The Commission official refused to comment on the content of the leaked documents.

The next meeting of ACTA negotiators will take place in New Zealand in April.

I have no clue how reliable this story is, but it seems like an inevitability to me. People don't care about privacy any more. They're too preoccupied by the stress of daily living combined with whatever entertainment or other distraction they use to forget (or try to) the clampdowns that have happened since 9/11/2001.

PRN gets the lowdown on Afghanistan

Amber Milgram interviews Stanley McChrystal

Original here.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Now that's good stuff...

Justin Raimondo takes aim at Andrew Sullivan. Looks like a killing shot to me.

The Weathervane as Metaphor

I've spent a fair amount of time saying to Sullivan supporters that their boy Randy Andy is nothing more than an enfant terrible who spends his time changing positions whenever that change will put him out front of the mainstream opinion. He's supported Republicans when they had control, Democrats when they had control, and presumably he'd fawn all over whomever may arise after our current govt's implosion -- even if that person is Vlad Tepes' true spiritual and practical heir.

He got his start back when I was much younger and still a Republican, I remember opinion journals fawning over this supposedly brilliant true rebel who was a Roman Catholic gay man who said he was a Thatcherite and Reganite. The conventions he broke! The traditions he mocked! Why he defies everything his person's various stereotypes would suggest!

Which is pretty much the whole point of Randy Andy -- sycophantic contrarian for hire. Sorta like Christopher Hitchens.

Friday, February 12, 2010

on Chris Hedges' latest...

...which is a pretty healthy blast of fresh air, and pretty courageous on many fronts... I have these thoughts:

I like that essay but I've noted 3 problems with it.

1) His references to anarchy remind me of the stereotypical woman cartoon character who screams and jumps onto a chair when she sees a mouse. He insists that anarchy seeks mob rule & bloodshed. For someone who's usually thorough, Hedges really fucks the poodle on that one.

2) He fails to note that the aggressive regulation he says is necessary for a healthy economy, it requires a leviathan government. Elsewhere in the essay he says government is too big and powerful. Tautology time for Hedges. Might be he needs to sport the dunce cap and point toward the corner.

3) He's not explicit about criticizing capitalism, although he sure dances around that type of criticism. Seems he has an ideal capitalism in mind. Maybe he ought to study a bit more human psychology so that he will understand how the many problems he's describing, they're attributable to the values that capitalism pursues/uses/endorses/adopts. There is no ideal capitalism in reality, despite what Ayn Rand and the von Mises Institute cronies argue.